Subscribe
Sign in
Home
Chat
Contact
REDD: An introduction
Archive
About
COP16
The US$700 billion biodiversity funding gap is a “bogus figure devised by US conservation corporations in collaboration with investment…
An unpublished letter to The Guardian.
Nov 12, 2024
•
Chris Lang
5
Share this post
REDD-Monitor
The US$700 billion biodiversity funding gap is a “bogus figure devised by US conservation corporations in collaboration with investment banks to promote private investment and market-based mechanisms”
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
7
The biodiversity funding gap “is a dangerous way to approach debates about what is needed to transform societies to improve nature…
In an interview with Acción Ecológica, Andre Standing explains what’s wrong with the whole idea of a US$700 billion biodiversity funding gap.
Nov 4, 2024
•
Chris Lang
8
Share this post
REDD-Monitor
The biodiversity funding gap “is a dangerous way to approach debates about what is needed to transform societies to improve nature conservation”
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Biodiversity offsets and credits: “ecological impacts, land dispossession, loss of livelihoods and systematic violations of individual and…
A neoliberal market that commodifies nature and delays action on the loss of biodiversity globally. What’s not to like?
Oct 23, 2024
•
Chris Lang
12
Share this post
REDD-Monitor
Biodiversity offsets and credits: “ecological impacts, land dispossession, loss of livelihoods and systematic violations of individual and collective rights of the affected communities”
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please
turn on JavaScript
or unblock scripts