Interesting thought experiment- using "conservation" and "trophy hunting" in combination. Or, "tourism" and "conservation". The other clever ploy, which might set a precedent for other countries, is to simply deny that the people are "Indigenous." Not that a presumption of Indigenous or non-Indigenous should in any way affect human rights. This is another example of a government acting as the enforcement agency of the business, while human rights are waved in an act of "othering." Thus, Tanzania appears to be a "justice-free" zone.
Interesting thought experiment- using "conservation" and "trophy hunting" in combination. Or, "tourism" and "conservation". The other clever ploy, which might set a precedent for other countries, is to simply deny that the people are "Indigenous." Not that a presumption of Indigenous or non-Indigenous should in any way affect human rights. This is another example of a government acting as the enforcement agency of the business, while human rights are waved in an act of "othering." Thus, Tanzania appears to be a "justice-free" zone.