In the graph the Y-axis is not defined. If that is amount of timber extracted in each year, a declining rate is meaningless - look at the total loss, subtracted from the original forest volume. And a plantation counts as a non-loss? Satellite records are essential. Then there's all the worthless credits from producing wood pellets as supposed "biofuels" for Japan, Korea, etc.
In the graph the Y-axis is not defined. If that is amount of timber extracted in each year, a declining rate is meaningless - look at the total loss, subtracted from the original forest volume. And a plantation counts as a non-loss? Satellite records are essential. Then there's all the worthless credits from producing wood pellets as supposed "biofuels" for Japan, Korea, etc.