Any chance these developments would inspire you to undertake some reflection on the strategic implications of your own advocacy? Attacking and destroying the "distraction" does not lead, here, to better effort on reduced emissions. The opposite. NBS and emissions reductions are sibling efforts in the broader tapestry of climate advocacy.…
Any chance these developments would inspire you to undertake some reflection on the strategic implications of your own advocacy? Attacking and destroying the "distraction" does not lead, here, to better effort on reduced emissions. The opposite. NBS and emissions reductions are sibling efforts in the broader tapestry of climate advocacy. You attack one part and you undermine the whole. At least worth considering.
Any chance these developments would inspire you to undertake some reflection on the strategic implications of your own advocacy? Attacking and destroying the "distraction" does not lead, here, to better effort on reduced emissions. The opposite. NBS and emissions reductions are sibling efforts in the broader tapestry of climate advocacy. You attack one part and you undermine the whole. At least worth considering.