Sorry, "Nature-Based Solutions" are more green baffle-gab. Our first task in ending our war against Nature should be *not one more sacrifice zone*, anywhere! Also, ending subsidies which finance environmental destruction. Next, Business will be trying to offset sacrifice zones! We all need to set Limits to Progress instead of trying to rip up this planet to find more energy sources, and lithium for billions of new cars. Enough!
However, Curry has a point when she says that, "Solutions [to the climate crisis] may have surprising unintended consequences that generate new vulnerabilities. In short, the cure could be worse than the disease.”
I think both WWF and Curry should study Kevin Anderson's overview of mitigation as if climate mattered - here are my notes of a presentation Anderson gave in January 2018:
Sorry, "Nature-Based Solutions" are more green baffle-gab. Our first task in ending our war against Nature should be *not one more sacrifice zone*, anywhere! Also, ending subsidies which finance environmental destruction. Next, Business will be trying to offset sacrifice zones! We all need to set Limits to Progress instead of trying to rip up this planet to find more energy sources, and lithium for billions of new cars. Enough!
WWF needs to study the latest on Dr. Judith Curry's blogsite: https://judithcurry.com/2023/02/24/climate-uncertainty-risk-the-presentation
Desmog and SourceWatch have produced detailed critiques of Judith Curry's climate denialism:
https://www.desmog.com/judith-curry/
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Judith_Curry
However, Curry has a point when she says that, "Solutions [to the climate crisis] may have surprising unintended consequences that generate new vulnerabilities. In short, the cure could be worse than the disease.”
I think both WWF and Curry should study Kevin Anderson's overview of mitigation as if climate mattered - here are my notes of a presentation Anderson gave in January 2018:
https://reddmonitor.substack.com/p/nature-cannot-be-fooled-kevin-anderson